BELL TEL. CO. OF PENN. v. PENN. PUB. UT. COM., 520 Pa. 114 (1989)

552 A.2d 1046

The BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Appellant, at No. 59. Appeal of David M. BARASCH, Consumer Advocate, at No. 58.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.Argued: January 18, 1989.
Decided: January 25, 1989.

Appeal Nos. 58 and 59 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1988 from Order of Commonwealth Court, 107 Pa. Commw. 34, 528 A.2d 268 (1987), entered June 19, 1987, at No. 3183 C.D. 1985, Reversing and Remanding in Part Order of Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission entered October 24, 1985, at Nos. R-842779 through R-842779CO24

David M. Barasch, Consumer Advocate, Daniel Clearfield, Asst. Consumer Advocate, for appellant in No. 58.

John A. Levin, Asst. Counsel, Camp Hill, Bohdan R. Pankiw, Deputy Chief Counsel, Daniel P. Delaney, Chief Counsel, Harrisburg, for appellant in No. 59.

Page 115

Thomas L. Welch, Daniel E. Monagle, Richard D. Spiegelman, Gerard J. St. John, Irving R. Segal, Philadelphia, for Bell Tel. Co. of Pa. at Nos. 58 and 59.

Peter A. Rohrbach, for U.S. Sprint at Nos. 58 and 59.

Edward J. Riehl, King of Prussia, for Business Users Group at Nos. 58 and 59.

John A. Levin, Camp Hill, Bohdan R. Pankiw, Daniel P. Delaney, Harrisburg, for Pa. Public Utility Com’n at No. 58.

Before LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS and STOUT, JJ.

ORDER
PER CURIAM:

Appeals dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

NIX, C.J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

ZAPPALA, J., dissents.