Categories: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Opinions

BIRDSBORO MUNICIPAL AUTH. v. READING CO., 565 Pa. 633 (2001)

771 A.2d 1276

BIRDSBORO MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY, Petitioner v. READING COMPANY AND WILMINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD, A CORPORATION; CHESTNUT HILL BM, INC.; STEVEN SPEECE, CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION; HAINES KIBBLEHOUSE, INC.; JOHN PENN, THOMAS PENN, RICHARD PENN, WINDSOR SERVICE INC.; DIAMOND CONTRACTORS, INC.; DANIEL BOONE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY; F.M. BROWN SONS, INC.; HEIRS SUCCESSORS IN TITLE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OR ASSIGNS, ANY UNKNOWN PERSONS HAVING OR CLAIMING AN APPARENT INTEREST IN THE PREMISES, Respondent. BIRDSBORO MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY v. READING COMPANY AND WILMINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD, A CORPORATION; CHESTNUT HILL BM, INC.; STEVEN SPEECE, CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION; HAINES KIBBLEHOUSE, INC.; JOHN PENN, THOMAS PENN, RICHARD PENN, WINDSOR SERVICE INC.; DIAMOND CONTRACTORS, INC.; DANIEL BOONE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY; F.M. BROWN SONS, INC.; HEIRS SUCCESSORS IN TITLE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OR ASSIGNS, ANY UNKNOWN PERSONS HAVING OR CLAIMING AN APPARENT INTEREST IN THE PREMISES, PETITION OF: WINDSOR SERVICE, INC.

Nos. 634 MAL 2000, 636 MAL 2000.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District.
January 29, 2001.

Petitions for Allowance of Appeal from Order of the Superior Court.

ORDER
PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 29th day of January, 2001, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal and Cross-Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are hereby DENIED.

Page 634

jdjungle