893 A.2d 67
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
February 7, 2006.
Petition for Allowance of Appeal No. 252 MAL 2003 from the Order of the Commonwealth Court.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 7th day of February 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED limited to the following issue:
Whether a “mere scintilla” of proof is sufficient to meet the regulatory requirement of 25 Pa. Code § 271.127(c) that the benefits of the proposed operation of a municipal waste landfill must “clearly outweigh the known and potential environmental harms.”
Page 266
243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…
24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…
Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…
52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…
334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…
191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…