CASSELL v. LANCASTER MENNONITE CONFERENCE, 578 Pa. 428 (2004)

853 A.2d 1009

MARYFRANCES CASSELL, Respondent v. LANCASTER MENNONITE CONFERENCE, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District.
June 14, 2004.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal No. 835 MAL 2003 from the Order of the Superior Court.

Prior Report: 834 A.2d 1185.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of June, 2004, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issue:

Whether the Superior Court departed from the established Frye standard by concluding the psychologist’s methodology was generally accepted in the field.

Page 429

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

COMMONWEALTH v. ALEXANDER, 243 A.3d 177 (2020)

243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…

8 months ago

BODAN v. FICKETT, 24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982)

24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…

2 years ago

IRWIN v. BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, 1 Pa. 349 (1845)

Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…

5 years ago

DURST v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC., 52 A.3d 357 (2012)

52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…

7 years ago

COMMONWEALTH v. SISTRUNK, 460 Pa. 655 (1975)

334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…

9 years ago

McINTYRE ET AL. v. POPE ET AL., 326 Pa. 172 (1937)

191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…

9 years ago