861 A.2d 259
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
October 15, 2004.
Appeal No. 171 MAP 2004 from the Order of the Commonwealth Court entered on 9/24/04 (exited 9/27/04) at No. 640 MD 2004.
Page 356
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2004, this Court having determined that the ripeness doctrine is not an impediment to further proceedings in the present matter, the order of dismissal entered by the Commonwealth Court is REVERSED, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings See generally City Council of Phila. v. Commonwealth, 806 A.2d 975, 978-80 (Pa.Cmwlth. 2002) (discussing the doctrine of ripeness), vacated and remanded on ripeness grounds, 577 Pa. 518, 847 A.2d 55 (2004).
Appellant’s request for oral argument is denied, and jurisdiction is relinquished.
243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…
24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…
Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…
52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…
334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…
191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…