COM. EX REL. RAKUS v. MARONEY, 435 Pa. 587 (1969)

257 A.2d 250

Commonwealth ex rel. Rakus, Appellant, v. Maroney.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.Submitted January 23, 1969.
October 9, 1969.

Criminal Law — Plea of guilty — Evidentiary hearing to determine whether plea was knowingly and voluntarily made.

Mr. Chief Justice BELL filed a dissenting opinion.

Before BELL, C. J., JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O’BRIEN, ROBERTS and POMEROY, JJ.

Appeal, No. 294, Jan. T., 1966, from order of Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County, Oct. T., 1965, No. 841, in case of Commonwealth ex rel. Frank Rakus v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent. Order vacated and record remanded.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Page 588

Petition denied without hearing, opinion by PINOLA, P. J. Relator appealed.

John E. O’Connor, for appellant.

Jerry B. Chariton, Assistant District Attorney, Charles D. Lemmond, Jr., First Assistant District Attorney, and Blythe H. Evans, Jr., District Attorney, for appellee.

OPINION PER CURIAM, October 9, 1969:

The order of the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County is vacated, and the record is remanded to that court for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether appellant’s guilty plea was knowingly and voluntarily made. See Commonwealth v. Patterson, 432 Pa. 76, 247 A.2d 218 (1968).

DISSENTING OPINION BY MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BELL:

The record shows that no evidentiary hearing was necessary. This sentence of murder was imposed in 1949 and the record shows that defendant’s two experienced counsel stated that they had investigated the case thoroughly, interviewed every witness they could, and felt that defendant’s change of plea from not guilty to guilty was in his best interest. To grant an evidentiary hearing in 1969 — on defendant’s allegation that his plea was involuntary and not knowingly made, even when his present Court-appointed counsel could not write a brief to support this allegation — is unnecessary, extremely unwise and extremely unfair to the law-abiding people of Pennsylvania. For these reasons, I dissent.

Page 589

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 257 A.2d 250

Recent Posts

COMMONWEALTH v. ALEXANDER, 243 A.3d 177 (2020)

243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…

8 months ago

BODAN v. FICKETT, 24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982)

24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…

2 years ago

IRWIN v. BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, 1 Pa. 349 (1845)

Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…

5 years ago

DURST v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC., 52 A.3d 357 (2012)

52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…

7 years ago

COMMONWEALTH v. SISTRUNK, 460 Pa. 655 (1975)

334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…

9 years ago

McINTYRE ET AL. v. POPE ET AL., 326 Pa. 172 (1937)

191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…

9 years ago