780 A.2d 602
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District.
August 21, 2001.
134 WAL 2001. Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court; Petition for Allowance to Proceed Pro Se.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 21st day of August, 2001, it is ORDERED as follows:
Petitioner was represented by appointed counsel in his appeal to the Superior Court, which resulted in affirmance of the judgment of sentence. Thereafter, petitioner filed a pro se petition for allowance of appeal.
Pa. R.Crim.P. 122(C)(3), formerly Pa. R.Crim.P. 316(c)(iii), requires that: “Where counsel has been assigned, such assignment shall be effective until final judgment, including any proceedings upon direct appeal.”
Petitioner’s counsel, appointed in connection with his appeal to the Superior Court, is directed to proceed in accordance with the Rule Commonwealth v. Hickox, 433 Pa. 144, 249 A.2d 777 (1969).
Page 234