825 A.2d 629
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District.
June 5, 2003.
No. 600 WAL 2002, Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the order of the Superior Court.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 5th day of June, 2003, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby granted in part, but limited to the issue of whether trial counsel was ineffective by failing to file a motion to supress the evidence found in the second search of Michelle Wilkinson’s vehicle and in failing to object to that evidence being introduced into evidence. See “Statement Pursuant to Rule 1925(b) of Appellate Procedure”, p. 3, para. 2a. The matter is remanded to the Superior Court for consideration and determination of this issue. In all other respects, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is denied.
Page 375
243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…
24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…
Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…
52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…
334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…
191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…