884 A.2d 248
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
September 13, 2005.
Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court.
Page 437
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, LIMITED to the following issue:
Whether the Commonwealth offered sufficient evidence to convict Petitioner of aggravated assault, graded as a felony of the first degree. In doing so, discuss the competing approaches contained in Commonwealth v. Mayo, 272 Pa.Super. 115, 414 A.2d 696 (1979) and Commonwealth v. Gruff, 822 A.2d 773 (Pa.Super. 2003) and which approach, or other approach, should be adopted as the law of the Commonwealth with respect to this issue.
243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…
24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…
Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…
52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…
334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…
191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…