864 A.2d 1204
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District.
December 28, 2004.
No. 227 EAL 2004, Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the order of the Superior Court.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 28th day of December, 2004, the above-captioned Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED. Petitioner’s following ancillary matters are also DENIED: Application for an Immediate Hearing on Application for Allowance of Appeal and De Novo Review, Pro Se Application for Appointment of Counsel, Motion for Transcription of All Proceedings and Discovery Material, Application for Bail Pending Outcome of Application for Allowance of Appeal and De Novo Review, Application for an Immediate Hearing on Application for Bail Pending Outcome of Application for Allowance of Appeal and De Novo Review, Application for an Immediate Hearing for Expediting Briefing Scheduling for the Advancement of Decision on Brief, and Application to Incorporate for Appropriate Relief Change in Status of Authorities Set Forth By the United State (sic) Supreme Court’s Latest Court Ruling in the Matter of Blakely v. Washintion (sic).
Finally, Petitioner’s Application for Relief Pursuant to Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 123, requesting that Petitioner be relieved from the obligation of providing an additional five copies of his Petition for Allowance of Appeal, is DENIED AS MOOT.
243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…
24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…
Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…
52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…
334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…
191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…