3 A.3d 667
No. 106 MAL 2010.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District.
August 26, 2010.
Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court, No. 106 MAL 2010.
Prior report: Pa.Super., 991 A.2d 909.
Page 91
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 26th day of August 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
The Superior Court erred as a matter of law when it vacated the trial court’s order on the basis that a federal conviction for felony mailing of extortionate communications did not constitute an infamous crime.
243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…
24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…
Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…
52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…
334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…
191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…