828 A.2d 1006
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District.
July 21, 2003.
No. 553 EAL 2002, Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Memorandum and Order of the Superior Court (McEwen,
Page 655
PJE, Ford Elliott, J. and Popovich, SJ) affirming the Judgment of Sentence of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (Lazarus, J).
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 21st day of July, 2003, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. Petitioner alleged a manifestly unreasonable and excessive sentence, supported by a Pa.R.A.P. 2119(f) statement to the Superior Court, but was denied review pursuant to Commonwealth v. Burton, 770 A.2d 771 (Pa.Super. 2001) (claim of excessiveness fails to raise substantial question when within statutory limits). The order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and this case is REMANDED for review consistent with Commonwealth V. Mouzon, 812 A.2d 617 (Pa 2002) (Opinion Announcing Judgment of the Court). Jurisdiction relinquished.
243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…
24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…
Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…
52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…
334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…
191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…