437 A.2d 385

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Joseph RUCKER, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
September 9, 1981.

Petition No. 302 E.D.Misc.Dkt. 1981, for Allowance of Appeal.

Page 345

ORDER
PER CURIAM.

And now, September 9, 1981, the petition for allowance of appeal is granted with respect to the issue of PCHA counsel’s ineffectiveness, the order of the Superior Court, 435 A.2d 271, is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether or not PCHA counsel was ineffective for failing to raise the adequacy of the guilty plea colloquy at the PCHA proceeding.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 437 A.2d 385

Recent Posts

COMMONWEALTH v. ALEXANDER, 243 A.3d 177 (2020)

243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…

8 months ago

BODAN v. FICKETT, 24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982)

24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…

2 years ago

IRWIN v. BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, 1 Pa. 349 (1845)

Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…

5 years ago

DURST v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC., 52 A.3d 357 (2012)

52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…

7 years ago

COMMONWEALTH v. SISTRUNK, 460 Pa. 655 (1975)

334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…

9 years ago

McINTYRE ET AL. v. POPE ET AL., 326 Pa. 172 (1937)

191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…

9 years ago