873 A.2d 1285
J-14-2005.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District.Argued March 8, 2005.
Decided May 17, 2005.
Appeal No. 93 MAP 2004 from the Order of the Superior Court entered on 8/1/03 at No. 509 EDA 2003 affirming the Order of the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, Civil Division, entered on 5/1/02 at No. 99-3555, George A. Pagano, J.
Albert A. DeGennaro, Esq., Harleysville, for J.P. Mascaro Sons, Inc.
Ronald Lee Daugherty, Esq., Malcolm Stewart Gould, Esq., Martin R. Lentz, Esq., Philadelphia, for County of Delaware.
BEFORE: CAPPY, C.J., CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and BAER, JJ.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, having found merit in Appellee’s argument that the issue on which appeal was allowed does not control the ultimate disposition of the case since there are multiple unchallenged theories of liability supporting the Superior Court’s disposition, we AFFIRM the
Page 591
Superior Court’s order, without reaching the issue on which allocatur was granted.
243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…
24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…
Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…
52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…
334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…
191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…