994 A.2d 1079
No. 410 EAL 2009.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District.
May 11, 2010.
Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court, No. 410 EAL 2009.
Prior report: Pa.Super., 971 A.2d 1258.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 11th day of May 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur isDENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
(1) Did the Superior Court err by permitting suits for more than one malignant disease resulting from the same asbestos exposure under the “two-disease” rule?
This case is consolidated for oral argument with No. 415 EAL 2009.
Page 44
243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…
24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…
Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…
52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…
334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…
191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…