759 A.2d 919-925 DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEALS

Com. v. Nalepha ………….. 7/12/ 158 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 W.D. 754 A.2d 21
(2000) Com. v. Neavins ………….. 7/20/ 182 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 W.D. 754 A.2d 21
(2000) Com. v. Nesbitt ………….. 7/20/ 117 Denied No. 3659 2000 E.D. Philadelphia (2000) 1998 Com. v. O’Brien ………….. 7/25/ 0278 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 W.D. 757 A.2d 995
(2000) Com. v. Oglesby ………….. 7/25/ 0002 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 W.D. 726 A.2d 414
(2000) Com. v. O’Hannon …………. 7/19/ 108 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 E.D. 754 A.2d 21
(2000) Com. v. Ortiz ……………. 7/19/ 138 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 E.D. 754 A.2d 21
(2000) Com. v. Pace …………….. 7/19/ 179 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 W.D. 754 A.2d 21
(2000) Com. v. Pasley …………… 7/17/ 54 E.D. Denied Pa.Super., 2000 (2000) 743 A.2d 521
Com. v. Pitts ……………. 7/10/ 0020 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 E.D. 752 A.2d 423
(2000) Com. v. Ray ……………… 7/25/ 213 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 E.D. 757 A.2d 996
(2000) Com. v. Reed …………….. 4/11/ 953 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 E.D. 750 A.2d 374
(1999) Com. v. Richardson ……….. 7/10/ 129 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 E.D. 752 A.2d 424
(2000) Com. v. Riley ……………. 7/11/ 123 Denied Pa.Super., 2000 W.D. 752 A.2d 424
(2000) Com. v. Rivera …………… 7/14/ 223 Denied No. 5204 2000 E.D. Philadelphia (1999) 1997

Page 675

Tagged: