994 A.2d 1081
No. 390 MAL 2009.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District.
May 19, 2010.
Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court, No. 390 MAL 2009.
Prior report: Pa.Super., 973 A.2d 1016.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 19th day of MAY, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED limited to the following issues:
1. Does the de facto merger doctrine always require proof of continuity of ownership?
2. Did the Superior Court improperly substitute its own fact-finding for that of the trial court?
Page 49
243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…
24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…
Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…
52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…
334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…
191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…