392 A.2d 352
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.Argued September 14, 1978
October 23, 1978.
Civil service — Demotion — Discrimination — Civil Service Act, Act 1941, August 5, P.L. 752 — Hearing.
1. Under the Civil Service Act, Act 1941, August 5, P.L. 752, the State Civil Service Commission must grant a hearing when requested by a classified employe appealing action by the appointing authority
Page 230
demoting the employe, particularly where it is alleged that such action was the result of discrimination and was grounded on non-merit factors. [230-1]
Argued September 14, 1978, before Judges CRUMLISH, JR., ROGERS and CRAIG, sitting as a panel of three.
Appeal, No. 1016 C.D. 1977, from the Order of the State Civil Service Commission in case of Gilbert M. Freedman v. Department of General Services, No. 2192.
Demotion by appointing authority appealed by employe to State Civil Service Commission. Appeal denied. Employe appealed to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Held: Remanded.
Philip D. Freedman, with him Caldwell, Clouser Kearns, for petitioner.
I. Lawrence Gelman, Assistant Chief Counsel, for respondent.
OPINION BY JUDGE ROGERS, October 23, 1978:
Gilbert M. Freedman, a member of the State classified service as defined in the Civil Service Act, Act of August 5, 1941, P.L. 752, as amended, 71 P. S. § 741.1 et seq., has filed a petition for review of the refusal, in writing, by the State Civil Service Commission to hear his appeals from a personnel action of his employer, the Department of General Services. Freedman’s appeals to the State Civil Service Commission alleged that he had been improperly demoted and that the demotion was moreover an act of discrimination against him as grounded on non-merit factors. The Civil Service Act provides that the Civil Service Commission “shall properly schedule and hold a public hearing upon” appeals from allegedly improper personnel
Page 231
actions generally (Subsection 951(a), 71 P. S. § 741.951(a)), and from allegedly discriminatory personnel actions in particular (Subsection 951(b), 71 P. S. § 741.951(b)).
It seems to be the position of the State Civil Service Commission that it may refuse a hearing on an appeal by a State employee from what the employee alleges is an unlawful demotion and a discriminatory unlawful demotion as well, if it appears to the Commission upon extra-judicial inquiry of the appointing authority that whatever happened did not effect the employee’s demotion. However efficacious such a procedure might prove in the Commission’s disposition of a doubtless crowded docket, it is plainly contrary to the Act’s provision that such factual determinations be made at a public hearing of the Commission.
We will therefore remand the record to the Commission for the necessary hearing.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 23rd day of October, 1978, the record is remanded to the State Civil Service Commission for hearing of the petitioner’s appeals as provided by law.