947 A.2d 1239
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
April 22, 2008.
Petition for Allowance of Appeal No. 423 WAL 2007 from the Order of the Superior Court.
Prior Report: Pa.Super., 932 A.2d 203.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 22nd day of April, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the issue set forth below. Allocatur isDENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Whether the MCARE Act foreclosed a plaintiff in a medical malpractice action against a urologist from offering expert
Page 620
testimony from a radiation oncologist to develop the applicable standard of care for the treatment of a cancer patient, upon the urologist’s review of a bone density study indicating “multiple foci of abnormal activity involving the right and left sides of the pelvis, the lower thoracic spine, right ribs, right mandible . . . consistent with osseous metastatic disease.”
Justice McCAFFERY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…
24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…
Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…
52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…
334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…
191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…