HAINDS v. BD. OF PROBATION PAROLE, 520 Pa. 295 (1989)

553 A.2d 962

Mark S. HAINDS, Petitioner, v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
February 17, 1989.

Petition No. 483 W.D. Allocatur Docket 1988 for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of Commonwealth Court

Page 296

entered June 20, 1988, at No. 1209 C.D. 1988, dismissing as untimely the Petition for Review from the decision of the Board of Probation and Parole entered February 22, 1988, at No. 3450-H denying the request for administrative relief.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.

The petition for allowance of appeal of Mark S. Hainds is granted. The Order of Commonwealth Court is reversed, and the case is remanded to Commonwealth Court for consideration of the merits of petitioner’s appeal nunc pro tunc from the decision of the respondent, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, which denied petitioner’s request for administrative relief.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 553 A.2d 962

Recent Posts

COMMONWEALTH v. ALEXANDER, 243 A.3d 177 (2020)

243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…

8 months ago

BODAN v. FICKETT, 24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982)

24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…

2 years ago

IRWIN v. BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, 1 Pa. 349 (1845)

Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…

5 years ago

DURST v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC., 52 A.3d 357 (2012)

52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…

7 years ago

COMMONWEALTH v. SISTRUNK, 460 Pa. 655 (1975)

334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…

9 years ago

McINTYRE ET AL. v. POPE ET AL., 326 Pa. 172 (1937)

191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…

9 years ago