HREHA v. HARRY SUGERMAN, INC., 482 Pa. 402 (1978)

393 A.2d 1168

John M. HREHA, Appellant, v. HARRY SUGERMAN, INC. and Pennsylvania Manufacturers’ Association Insurance Co., and Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.Submitted January 13, 1978.
Decided October 5, 1978.

Appeal from the Commonwealth Court, No. 1611 C.D. 1975, Roy Wilkinson, Jr., J.

Page 403

Robert W. Munley, Scranton, for appellant.

H. R. VanDeusen, Jr., Scranton, for appellee.

Before EAGEN, C. J., and O’BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY, NIX, MANDERINO and LARSEN, JJ.

OPINION
NIX, Justice.

John M. Hreha, Sr. was employed at a drugstore located on Route 6 in Lackawanna County. On May 28, 1974, as was his custom, appellee left the store for lunch and on return to resume his duties, parked his car in a lot provided by his employer. The employee was required to park his vehicle in this parking lot by order of his employer. A contiguous parking lot was reserved for customers of the store and the employees were directed not to use it. To reach the store from the lot it was necessary to traverse the public highway. As Mr. Hreha was crossing the highway upon his return from lunch, he was struck by an automobile and sustained injuries for which he claimed compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, art. 1, § 101 et seq., as amended, 77 P. S. § 1
et seq. (Supp. 1978-79).

The Referee awarded benefits to Mr. Hreha and that action was affirmed by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board. The Commonwealth Court relying upon its opinion in North American Rockwell Corp. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 21 Pa. Commw. 437,

Page 404

346 A.2d 379 (1975), reversed the Board and held that an employee injured while crossing a public highway to get from the employer’s plant to a parking lot supplied by the employer and in which the employee was required to park, was not on the premises of the employer. We granted review to consider this question.

In a decision filed this day we have held that the fact that the accident occurred in a public highway does not preclude compensation under section 301(c)(1) of the Act supra, 77 P. S. § 411(1); provided that the area is an integral part of the employer’s business. Epler v. North American Rockwell Corp., 482 Pa. 391, 393 A.2d 1163, 1164-1165 (1978). Under the indisputed facts of this case, Epler is controlling.

Order of the Commonwealth Court is vacated and the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board awarding compensation to the employee is reinstated.

ROBERTS, J., did not participate in the decision of this case.

POMEROY, J., filed a concurring opinion.

POMEROY, Justice, concurring.

I concur separately in this case because of my view as expressed in Epler v. North American Rockwell Corporation, 482 Pa. 391, 393 A.2d 1163 (1978).

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

COMMONWEALTH v. ALEXANDER, 243 A.3d 177 (2020)

243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…

8 months ago

BODAN v. FICKETT, 24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982)

24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…

2 years ago

IRWIN v. BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, 1 Pa. 349 (1845)

Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…

5 years ago

DURST v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC., 52 A.3d 357 (2012)

52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…

7 years ago

COMMONWEALTH v. SISTRUNK, 460 Pa. 655 (1975)

334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…

9 years ago

McINTYRE ET AL. v. POPE ET AL., 326 Pa. 172 (1937)

191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…

9 years ago