Categories: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Opinions

HUTCHISON v. LUDDY, 533 Pa. 72 (1993)

619 A.2d 276

Samuel C. HUTCHISON v. Father Francis LUDDY, Bishop James Hogan, Monsignor Thomas Madden, Monsignor Roy F. Kline, Monsignor Paul Panza, Monsignor Ignatius Wadas, Diocese of Altoona-Johnstown, St. Mary’s Catholic Church, Cardinal John Krol, and the ArchDiocese of Philadelphia, Respondents. Petition of The PITTSBURGH PRESS COMPANY, Petitioner-Intervenor.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
August 22, 1991.

Petition No. 653 W.D. Allocatur Dkt. 1990, for Allowance of Appeal of the Intervenor Pittsburgh Press Company from the Order of Superior Court, 398 Pa. Super. 505, 581 A.2d 578. Entered on August 27, 1990 at No. 339 Pittsburgh 1989, which affirmed in part and reversed in part the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Somerset County, Civil Division, No. 445 of 1988 Entered on December 23, 1988, and remanded the

Page 73

case for entry of Order consistent with Opinion. Jurisdiction is Relinquised.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Allowance of Appeal of The Pittsburgh Press Company is GRANTED, limited to the issue of whether The Pittsburgh Press Company may intervene in this action for the limited purpose of opposing a motion to seal the record with respect to discovery.

In addition, the appeal of The Pittsburgh Press Company is hereby expedited for argument during the September 1991 session in Pittsburgh.

All other aspects of the Petition for Allowance of Appeal are hereby DENIED.

jdjungle