No. 1671 Disciplinary Docket No. 3, Board File No. C4-10-392.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
July 6, 2011.
Supreme Court of California, State Bar Court Case No. 00-O-10501.
Attorney Registration No. 59177.
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 6th day of July, 2011, David Keith Burgess having been disbarred from the practice of law in the State of California by Order of the Supreme Court of California filed May 31, 2002; the said David Keith Burgess having been directed on January 31, 2011, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is
ORDERED that David Keith Burgess is disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.
243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…
24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…
Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…
52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…
334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…
191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…