No. 1152 Disciplinary Docket No. 3, Board File No. C4-06-275, Attorney Registration No. 70382.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Decided: September 7, 2006.
(Court of Appeals of Maryland, Misc. Docket AG No. 57, September Term, 2004)
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 7th day of September, 2006, Candace Kay Calhoun having been indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland by Opinion of the Court of Appeals of Maryland filed March 9, 2006; the said Candace Kay Calhoun having been directed on May 25, 2006, to inform this Court of any claim she has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is
ORDERED that Candace Kay Calhoun is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth consistent with the Opinion of the Court of Appeals of Maryland filed March 9, 2006, and she shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.
243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…
24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…
Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…
52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…
334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…
191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…