No. 1637 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
January 19, 2011.
Board File No. C1-10-712, (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, No. 10-BG-567), Attorney Registration No. 61488.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 19th day of January, 2011, by Opinion and Order of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided July 1, 2010, Mohamed Sadu Bah was suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of thirty days with the suspension stayed, followed by a one-year period of supervised probation with conditions; the said Mohamed Sadu Bah was directed on October 4, 2010, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and upon consideration of the responses filed, this Court hereby imposes reciprocal discipline in this Commonwealth consistent with that imposed by Opinion and Order of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided July 1, 2010.
Page 1
243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…
24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…
Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…
52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…
334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…
191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…