789 A.2d 549

IN THE MATTER OF DAVID ALLEN CURCIO.

No. 708 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
November 8, 2001.

ORDER
Per Curiam:

AND NOW, this 8th day of November 2001, upon consideration of the certified copy of the Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated July 24, 2001, placing David Allen Curcio on disability inactive status, and filed with this Court pursuant to Rule 301(c), Pa.R.D.E., it is hereby

ORDERED that David Allen Curcio’s status be immediately modified from inactive status pursuant to Rule 219, Pa.R.D.E., to inactive status pursuant to Rule 301(c), Pa.R.D.E., for an indefinite period until further Order of this Court, and he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 789 A.2d 549

Recent Posts

COMMONWEALTH v. ALEXANDER, 243 A.3d 177 (2020)

243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…

8 months ago

BODAN v. FICKETT, 24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982)

24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…

2 years ago

IRWIN v. BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, 1 Pa. 349 (1845)

Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…

5 years ago

DURST v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC., 52 A.3d 357 (2012)

52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…

7 years ago

COMMONWEALTH v. SISTRUNK, 460 Pa. 655 (1975)

334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…

9 years ago

McINTYRE ET AL. v. POPE ET AL., 326 Pa. 172 (1937)

191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…

9 years ago