IN RE DUCOTE, 80 WM 2006 (Pa. 10-5-2006)

IN RE: RICHARD L. DUCOTE, ESQ. OF THE LOUISIANA BAR, LOCATED IN PENNSYLVANIA PURSUANT TO SEPTEMBER 19, 2005, ORDER RELATIVE TO ATTORNEYS DISPLACED BY HURRICANE KATRINA (NO. 377, SUPREME COURT RULES, DOCKET 1).

No. 80 WM 2006.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District.
October 5, 2006.

ORDER
PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 5th day of October, 2006, the extension of time to practice law under the terms and conditions of In Re:Practice of Law By Attorneys Displaced by Hurricane Katrina,
No. 377 Supreme Court Rules Docket No. 1, is granted until October 31, 2006. No further extensions of time will be granted.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

COMMONWEALTH v. ALEXANDER, 243 A.3d 177 (2020)

243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…

8 months ago

BODAN v. FICKETT, 24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982)

24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…

2 years ago

IRWIN v. BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, 1 Pa. 349 (1845)

Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…

5 years ago

DURST v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC., 52 A.3d 357 (2012)

52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…

7 years ago

COMMONWEALTH v. SISTRUNK, 460 Pa. 655 (1975)

334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…

9 years ago

McINTYRE ET AL. v. POPE ET AL., 326 Pa. 172 (1937)

191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…

9 years ago