IN RE LORD’S NEW CHURCH, 576 Pa. 717 (2003)

839 A.2d 354

IN RE: THE LORD’S NEW CHURCH WHICH IS NOVA HIEROSOLYMA. PETITION OF: NOVA DOMINI QUAE EST NOVA HIEROSOLYMA, THE LORD’S NEW CHURCH WHICH IS NOVA HIEROSOLYMA.

No. 552 MAL 2003.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District.
December 9, 2003.

No. 552 MAL 2003, Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 9th day of December, 2003, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby DENIED.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 839 A.2d 354

Recent Posts

COMMONWEALTH v. ALEXANDER, 243 A.3d 177 (2020)

243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…

8 months ago

BODAN v. FICKETT, 24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982)

24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…

2 years ago

IRWIN v. BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, 1 Pa. 349 (1845)

Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…

5 years ago

DURST v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC., 52 A.3d 357 (2012)

52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…

7 years ago

COMMONWEALTH v. SISTRUNK, 460 Pa. 655 (1975)

334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…

9 years ago

McINTYRE ET AL. v. POPE ET AL., 326 Pa. 172 (1937)

191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…

9 years ago