801 A.2d 1208

IN THE MATTER OF ROMAINE PHILLIPS, Petition for Reinstatement.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
June 19, 2002.

No. 611 Disciplinary Docket No. 2 (No. 45 RST 2001), Disciplinary Board No. 25 DB 88 Attorney Registration No. 20445 (Philadelphia).

ORDER
PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 19th day of June, 2002, the Petition for Reinstatement is denied and petitioner is forever barred from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. See Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Keller, 506 A.2d 872 (Pa. 1986). Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in

Page 196

the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Mr. Justice CASTILLE did not participate in this matter.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

COMMONWEALTH v. ALEXANDER, 243 A.3d 177 (2020)

243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…

8 months ago

BODAN v. FICKETT, 24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982)

24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…

2 years ago

IRWIN v. BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, 1 Pa. 349 (1845)

Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…

5 years ago

DURST v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC., 52 A.3d 357 (2012)

52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…

7 years ago

COMMONWEALTH v. SISTRUNK, 460 Pa. 655 (1975)

334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…

9 years ago

McINTYRE ET AL. v. POPE ET AL., 326 Pa. 172 (1937)

191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…

9 years ago