IN RE RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMIN. 701, 338 (Pa. 12-17-2009)

IN RE: ORDER AMENDING RULE 701(A)(1) OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION.

No. 338.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
December 17, 2009.

Judicial Administration.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of December, 2009, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania that Rule 701 (A)(1) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Judicial Administration is amended in the attached form.

To the extent that notice of proposed rulemaking would be required by Pa.R.J.A. No. 103 or otherwise, the amendment of Pa.R.J.A. No. 701(A)(1) is hereby found to be required in the interests of justice and efficient administration.

This ORDER shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall be effective January 4, 2010.

Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined. Deletions from the rule are shown in bold and brackets.

CLICK TO VIEW AMENDMENT

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

COMMONWEALTH v. ALEXANDER, 243 A.3d 177 (2020)

243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…

8 months ago

BODAN v. FICKETT, 24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982)

24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…

2 years ago

IRWIN v. BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, 1 Pa. 349 (1845)

Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…

5 years ago

DURST v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC., 52 A.3d 357 (2012)

52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…

7 years ago

COMMONWEALTH v. SISTRUNK, 460 Pa. 655 (1975)

334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…

9 years ago

McINTYRE ET AL. v. POPE ET AL., 326 Pa. 172 (1937)

191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…

9 years ago