868 A.2d 1195
No. 893 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
February 25, 2005.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 25th day of February, 2005, a Rule having been entered by this Court on December 29, 2004, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Mark Peter Pazuhanich to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension, upon consideration of the response filed, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Mark Peter Pazuhanich is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa. R.D.E.
Page 89
243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…
24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…
Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…
52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…
334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…
191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…