897 A.2d 1162
No. 1106 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
March 28, 2006.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2006, a Rule having been entered by this Court on January 26, 2006, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Richard Kanoy Doty to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Richard Kanoy Doty is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.
Madame Justice BALDWIN did not participate in this matter.
Page 129
243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…
24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…
Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…
52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…
334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…
191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…