647 A.2d 211
No. 668, Disciplinary Docket No. 2. No. 3 DB 89 Disciplinary Board.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
August 24, 1994.
PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 24th day of August, 1994, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated July 18, 1994, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.
Page 180
Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.
ZAPPALA and MONTEMURO, JJ., did not participate in this matter.
243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…
24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…
Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…
52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…
334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…
191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…