693 A.2d 579
No. 289 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
February 24, 1997.
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 24th day of February, 1997, Frederick S. Schofield, III, having been disbarred by consent from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated September 25, 1996; the said Frederick S. Schofield, III, having been directed on December 18, 1996, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is
ORDERED that Frederick S. Schofield, III, is disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.
Page 27
243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…
24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…
Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…
52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…
334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…
191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…