McGILL v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE OF PHILA, 89 EM 2006 (Pa. 9-14-2006)

ANTHONY McGILL, Petitioner v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY AND PHILADELPHIA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Respondents.

No. 89 EM 2006.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District.
Decided: September 14, 2006.

ORDER
PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of September, 2006, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is granted and the Application for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief is denied.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

COMMONWEALTH v. ALEXANDER, 243 A.3d 177 (2020)

243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…

8 months ago

BODAN v. FICKETT, 24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982)

24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…

2 years ago

IRWIN v. BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, 1 Pa. 349 (1845)

Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…

5 years ago

DURST v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC., 52 A.3d 357 (2012)

52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…

7 years ago

COMMONWEALTH v. SISTRUNK, 460 Pa. 655 (1975)

334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…

9 years ago

McINTYRE ET AL. v. POPE ET AL., 326 Pa. 172 (1937)

191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…

9 years ago