779 A.2d 484
No. 683 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
June 18, 2001.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 18th day of June, 2001, an Order and Rule to Show Cause having been entered by this Court on May 14,
Page 197
2001, and “10 response to the Rule to Show Cause having been filed, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Rule is made absolute and, pursuant to Rule 208(f), Pa.R.D.E., respondent is placed on temporary suspension until further definitive action by this Court;
2. Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.
3. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, in accordance with Rule 217(g), Pa.R.D.E., shall take such further action and make such further orders as may appear necessary to fully protect the rights and interests of respondent’s clients; and
4. All Financial institutions in which respondent holds accounts containing fiduciary funds shall freeze such accounts pending further order of this Court.
This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline within the meaning of Rule 402, Pa.R.D.E., pertaining to confidentiality.
243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…
24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…
Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…
52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…
334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…
191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…