OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. FEINGOLD, 1093 (Pa. 6-1-2007)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. ALLEN L. FEINGOLD, Respondent.

Nos. 1093 and 1161 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
June 1, 2007.

Attorney Registration No. 03892 (Philadelphia).

ORDER
PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 1st day of June, 2007, a Rule to Show Cause having been entered by this Court on February 2, 2007, and upon consideration of the response filed, it is hereby ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute, respondent is held in contempt for willful violation of this Court’s Orders of March 3, 2006, and August 22, 2006, and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board for a hearing to recommend the appropriate sanction.

Page 1

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

COMMONWEALTH v. ALEXANDER, 243 A.3d 177 (2020)

243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…

8 months ago

BODAN v. FICKETT, 24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982)

24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…

2 years ago

IRWIN v. BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, 1 Pa. 349 (1845)

Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…

5 years ago

DURST v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC., 52 A.3d 357 (2012)

52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…

7 years ago

COMMONWEALTH v. SISTRUNK, 460 Pa. 655 (1975)

334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…

9 years ago

McINTYRE ET AL. v. POPE ET AL., 326 Pa. 172 (1937)

191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…

9 years ago