OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HAAGENSEN, 1397 (Pa. 2-17-2010)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. JANICE SHELBURNE HAAGENSEN, Respondent.

No. 1397 Disciplinary Docket No. 3, No. 170 DB 2006.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
February 17, 2010.

Attorney Registration No. 49982, (Lawrence County).

ORDER
PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of February, 2010, a Rule having been entered upon respondent by this Court on November 18, 2009, to show cause why she should not be suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of one year and one day and no response having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute, respondent is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of one year and one day and she shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

COMMONWEALTH v. ALEXANDER, 243 A.3d 177 (2020)

243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…

8 months ago

BODAN v. FICKETT, 24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982)

24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…

2 years ago

IRWIN v. BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, 1 Pa. 349 (1845)

Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…

5 years ago

DURST v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC., 52 A.3d 357 (2012)

52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…

7 years ago

COMMONWEALTH v. SISTRUNK, 460 Pa. 655 (1975)

334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…

9 years ago

McINTYRE ET AL. v. POPE ET AL., 326 Pa. 172 (1937)

191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…

9 years ago