OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HAMMER, 580 Pa. 491 (2004)

862 A.2d 74

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. Paul L. HAMMER, Respondent.

No. 376 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
October 13, 2004.

ORDER
PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2004, respondent having failed to comply with the Order entered by this Court on August 12, 2004, it is

Page 492

ORDERED that respondent is hereby placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 208(f)(5), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Further, Office of Disciplinary Counsel is directed to consider respondent’s conduct at the September 10, 2004, proceeding in any subsequently filed Petition for Discipline.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 862 A.2d 74

Recent Posts

COMMONWEALTH v. ALEXANDER, 243 A.3d 177 (2020)

243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…

8 months ago

BODAN v. FICKETT, 24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982)

24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…

2 years ago

IRWIN v. BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, 1 Pa. 349 (1845)

Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…

5 years ago

DURST v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC., 52 A.3d 357 (2012)

52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…

7 years ago

COMMONWEALTH v. SISTRUNK, 460 Pa. 655 (1975)

334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…

9 years ago

McINTYRE ET AL. v. POPE ET AL., 326 Pa. 172 (1937)

191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…

9 years ago