774 A.2d 730
No. 957 Disciplinary Docket No. 2.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
March 8, 2001.
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 8th day of March, 2001, a Rule having been entered upon respondent by this Court on December 14, 2000, to show cause why the Order of this Court entered on August 25, 1999, should not be modified and, upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute, respondent’s probation is revoked and he is suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day. Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that the respondent shall pay the
Page 438
expenses of the investigation and prosecution of the revocation proceedings pursuant to Rule 208 (g), Pa.R.D.E.
243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…
24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…
Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…
52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…
334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…
191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…