OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. STENHACH, 576 Pa. 207 (2003)

839 A.2d 172

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL Petitioner v. GEORGE STENHACH Respondent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
October 9, 2003.

No. 625, Disciplinary Docket, No. 3 — Supreme Court, No. 11 DB 2001, Disciplinary Board, Attorney Registration No. 31181, (Potter County).

ORDER
PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 9th day of October, 2003, on certification by the Disciplinary Board that the respondent, GEORGE STENHACH, who was suspended by Order of this Court dated November 25, 2002, for a period of nine months, has filed a verified statement showing compliance with all the terms and conditions of the Order of Suspension and Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E., and there being no other outstanding order of suspension or disbarment, GEORGE STENHACH, is hereby reinstated to active status. effective immediately.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 839 A.2d 172

Recent Posts

COMMONWEALTH v. ALEXANDER, 243 A.3d 177 (2020)

243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…

8 months ago

BODAN v. FICKETT, 24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982)

24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…

2 years ago

IRWIN v. BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, 1 Pa. 349 (1845)

Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…

5 years ago

DURST v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC., 52 A.3d 357 (2012)

52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…

7 years ago

COMMONWEALTH v. SISTRUNK, 460 Pa. 655 (1975)

334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…

9 years ago

McINTYRE ET AL. v. POPE ET AL., 326 Pa. 172 (1937)

191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…

9 years ago