OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WALSH, 555 Pa. 420 (1999)

724 A.2d 928

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. James Michael WALSH, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
February 5, 1999.

ORDER
PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 5th day of February, 1999, on certification by the Disciplinary Board that the respondent, JAMES MICHAEL WALSH, who was suspended by Order of this Court dated November a, 1997, for a period of one year, has filed a verified statement showing compliance with all the terms and conditions of the Order of Suspension and Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E., and there being no other outstanding order of suspension or disbarment. JAMES MICHAEL WALSH, is hereby reinstated to active status, effective immediately.

Page 421

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 724 A.2d 928

Recent Posts

COMMONWEALTH v. ALEXANDER, 243 A.3d 177 (2020)

243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…

8 months ago

BODAN v. FICKETT, 24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982)

24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…

2 years ago

IRWIN v. BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, 1 Pa. 349 (1845)

Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…

5 years ago

DURST v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC., 52 A.3d 357 (2012)

52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…

7 years ago

COMMONWEALTH v. SISTRUNK, 460 Pa. 655 (1975)

334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…

9 years ago

McINTYRE ET AL. v. POPE ET AL., 326 Pa. 172 (1937)

191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…

9 years ago