Categories: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Opinions

PENNACCHIO v. SNIPES, 558 Pa. 408 (1999)

737 A.2d 738

ANNA PENNACCHIO AND DANIEL PENNACCHIO, Respondents v. SAMUEL M. SNIPES, BARBARA T. SNIPES, BRADSHAW SNIPES, AND INGEBORG L. SNIPES T/A SNIPES FARM NURSERY, A PARTNERSHIP, Petitioners

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District.
September 29, 1999.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Superior Court, No. 689 M.D. Allocatur Docket 1999.

Stephen N. Huntington, for petitioner.

ORDER
PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 29th day of September, 1999, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, and the order of the Superior Court is MODIFIED to provide as follows:

The order of the trial court granting summary judgment based upon the claim of immunity pursuant to the Recreation Use of Land and Water Act, 68 P. S. § 477-1, et seq., is REVERSED, and the matter remanded to the trial court

Page 409

for consideration of the additional ground for relief asserted in Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, namely, the claim to immunity pursuant to the Agricultural Immunity Act, 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 8339.

Jurisdiction is relinquished.

jdjungle