ROHM HAAS CO v. LIN, 408 MAL 2010 (Pa. 4-6-2011)

19 A.3d 1052

ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY, Respondent v. DR. MANHUA MANDY LIN, Petitioner.

No. 408 MAL 2010.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District.
April 6, 2011.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2011, the Motion to Seal the Certified Record, All Motions, Briefs, and the Reproduced Record in Proceedings on the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, filed on behalf of Rohm and Haas Company, isGRANTED. The Petition for Allowance of Appeal isDENIED.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 19 A.3d 1052

Recent Posts

COMMONWEALTH v. ALEXANDER, 243 A.3d 177 (2020)

243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…

8 months ago

BODAN v. FICKETT, 24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982)

24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…

2 years ago

IRWIN v. BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, 1 Pa. 349 (1845)

Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…

5 years ago

DURST v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC., 52 A.3d 357 (2012)

52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…

7 years ago

COMMONWEALTH v. SISTRUNK, 460 Pa. 655 (1975)

334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…

9 years ago

McINTYRE ET AL. v. POPE ET AL., 326 Pa. 172 (1937)

191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…

9 years ago