RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION 1906, 334 (Pa. 9-17-2009)

IN RE: ORDER PROMULGATING RULE 1906 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION.

No. 334.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District.
September 17, 2009.

Judicial Administration.

Rule 1906. Prohibited Communication with Jurists.

No litigant or any other participant in a legal matter or proceeding shall send a communication related thereto to the home address of a jurist. Such communications will not be reviewed and will have no legal or procedural significance. The communication will not be returned or forwarded, but will be destroyed.

Explanatory Comment:
For purposes of this rule, the term “jurist” encompasses all jurists at any level of the Unified Judicial System. It includes, but is not limited to, Justices of the Supreme Court, as well as judges of the appellate courts, courts of common pleas and the minor courts.

These types of communications will have no effect on the legal matter or proceeding. For example, the mailing of a prohibited correspondence will neither toll the applicable statute of limitation nor change any filing date requirements.

ORDER AND NOW, this 17th day of September, 2009, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania that new Rule 1906 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Judicial Administration is approved in the attached form.

To the extent that prior distribution and publication of this rule would otherwise be required, it has been determined pursuant to Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(a)(3) that immediate promulgation is required in the interests of justice and efficient administration.

This ORDER shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall be effective immediately.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

COMMONWEALTH v. ALEXANDER, 243 A.3d 177 (2020)

243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…

8 months ago

BODAN v. FICKETT, 24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982)

24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…

2 years ago

IRWIN v. BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, 1 Pa. 349 (1845)

Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…

5 years ago

DURST v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC., 52 A.3d 357 (2012)

52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…

7 years ago

COMMONWEALTH v. SISTRUNK, 460 Pa. 655 (1975)

334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…

9 years ago

McINTYRE ET AL. v. POPE ET AL., 326 Pa. 172 (1937)

191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…

9 years ago