SUSTAR v. PENN SMOKELESS COAL CO., 285 Pa. 395 (1926)

132 A. 345

Sustar v. Penn Smokeless Coal Co., Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.January 25, 1926.
February 8, 1926.

Workmen’s compensation — Loss of body members — Disfigurement of head and face — Acts of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736; June 26, 1919, P. L. 642, and May 20, 1921, P. L. 966.

Compensation payable under the Act of May 20, 1921, P. L. 966, may be awarded for permanent disfigurement of head or face, in addition to that for loss of a body-member, in the same manner that compensation for the loss of two or more members is to be awarded under clause 306 (c) of the Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, as amended by the Act of June 26, 1919, P. L. 642.

Argued January 25, 1926.

Appeal, No. 162, March T., 1925, by Travelers Insurance Co., from judgment of

Page 396

Superior Court, April T., 1925, No. 154, reversing judgment of C. P. Somerset Co., Dec. T., 1925, No. 279, reversing decision of Workmen’s Compensation Board, awarding claim in case of Andy Sustar v. Penn Smokeless Coal Co. and the Travelers Insurance Co.

Before MOSCHZISKER, C. J., FRAZER, WALLING, SIMPSON, KEPHART, SADLER and SCHAFFER, JJ. Affirmed.

Appeal from Superior Court.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts.

Judgment of common pleas reversed. Travelers Insurance Co., insurance carrier, appealed.

Error assigned was judgment, quoting it.

J. D. Darragh, for appellant, cited: Lente v. Luci, 275 Pa. 217; Bausch v. Fidler, 277 Pa. 573; Simon v. Maryland Battery Service Co., 276 Pa. 473.

Peter P. Jurchak, for appellee.

PER CURIAM, February 8, 1926:

The Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1915, P. L. 736, article II, section 306, clause (c), as amended by the Act of June 26, 1919, P. L. 642, provides that certain compensation shall be paid for fixed periods of time for the loss of each of the specified body-members. Then follows this clause: “For the loss of any two or more of such members not constituting total disability, sixty per centum of wages during the aggregate of the periods specified for each.” The Act of May 20, 1921, P. L. 966, further amended the original act by adding, immediately after the above-quoted clause, a provision for the payment of compensation, for a period to be fixed by the compensation board, for permanent disfigurement of the head or face. The Superior Court (85 Pa. Super. 531), reversing the Common Pleas of Somerset County, properly decided that compensation payable under the

Page 397

Act of 1921, is not exclusive of all other compensation, but may be awarded for disfigurement in addition to that given for loss of a body-member, in the same manner that compensation for the loss of two or more members is to be awarded under the clause of section 306 (c) above quoted. Defendant has appealed.

The opinion of the Superior Court is adopted by us, and thereon,

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 132 A. 345

Recent Posts

COMMONWEALTH v. ALEXANDER, 243 A.3d 177 (2020)

243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…

8 months ago

BODAN v. FICKETT, 24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982)

24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…

2 years ago

IRWIN v. BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, 1 Pa. 349 (1845)

Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…

5 years ago

DURST v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC., 52 A.3d 357 (2012)

52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…

7 years ago

COMMONWEALTH v. SISTRUNK, 460 Pa. 655 (1975)

334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…

9 years ago

McINTYRE ET AL. v. POPE ET AL., 326 Pa. 172 (1937)

191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…

9 years ago