Articles Tagged: 93 A.2d 451

93 A.2d 451 Loch v. Confair, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.November 13, 1952. January 5, 1953. Negligence — Evidence — Circumstantial evidence — Doctrine of exclusive control — Bottled beverage — Unexplained bursting. 1. The theory of exclusive control is that, when the instrumentality which causes the injury is shown to be under the management […]

93 A.2d 451 Menger, Appellant, v. Lyon. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.November 17, 1952. January 5, 1953. Before STERN, C. J., STEARNE, JONES, BELL, CHIDSEY and MUSMANNO, JJ. Appeal, No. 10, May T., 1953, from decree of Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County, March T., 1951, No. 79, in case of John L. Menger et […]