Categories: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Opinions

TOWNHALL OF AMERICA v. SALEM TOWNSHIP, 568 Pa. 325 (2002)

796 A.2d 965

TOWNHALL OF AMERICA, INC., A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, Petitioner v. SALEM TOWNSHIP, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. SALEM TOWNSHIP, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. TOWNHALL OF AMERICA, INC., T/D/B/A “CLIMAX,” A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, AND NICHOLAS FRATANGELO, Petitioners TOWNHALL OF AMERICA, INC., A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, Petitioner SUBDIVISION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent TOWNHALL OF AMERICA, INC., A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, v. SALEM TOWNSHIP, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, SALEM TOWNSHIP, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, T/D/B/A “CLIMAX,” A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, AND NICHOLAS FRATANGELO, PETITION OF: TOWNHALL OF AMERICA, INC., T/D/B/A “CLIMAX,” A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, AND NICHOLAS FRATANGELO.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District.
April 10, 2002.

No. 389 WAL 2001, No. 390 WAL 2001, No. 391 WAL 2001, No. 392 WAL 2001. Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Commonwealth Court.

Page 326

ORDER
PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of April, 2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby DENIED and the Application for Supersedeas is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

jdjungle