WARD v. BOARDD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, 594 Pa. 467 (2007)

937 A.2d 384

Fred WARD, Petitioner v. BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Raymond J. Sobina, Shelley Thompson, Respondents.

No. 68 EM 2007.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District.
November 14, 2007.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of November, 2007, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is granted. The

Page 468

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and/or Writ of Prohibition and Application for Immediate Hearing are denied. The judge’s name is to be stricken from the caption.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 937 A.2d 384

Recent Posts

COMMONWEALTH v. ALEXANDER, 243 A.3d 177 (2020)

243 A.3d 177 (2020) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Keith ALEXANDER, Appellant. No. 30 EAP…

8 months ago

BODAN v. FICKETT, 24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982)

24 Pa. D. & C. 3d 115 (1982) Bodan v. Fickett No. 2726 Civil 1981.Common…

2 years ago

IRWIN v. BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, 1 Pa. 349 (1845)

Irwin v. Bank of the United States, 1 Pa. 349 (1845) Sept. 1845 · Supreme Court of…

5 years ago

DURST v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC., 52 A.3d 357 (2012)

52 A.3d 357 (2012) Maureen DURST and Scott Durst, Appellants v. MILROY GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.…

7 years ago

COMMONWEALTH v. SISTRUNK, 460 Pa. 655 (1975)

334 A.2d 280 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward SISTRUNK a/k/a Edward Brooks, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of…

9 years ago

McINTYRE ET AL. v. POPE ET AL., 326 Pa. 172 (1937)

191 A. 607 McIntyre et al., Appellants, v. Pope et al.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 25,…

9 years ago