WHITE v. GEORGE, 570 Pa. 59 (2003)

807 A.2d 905

MARY L. WHITE, INDIVIDUALLY AND DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF ASSOCIATES IN CHILD GUIDANCE, INC., A CLOSE CORPORATION, v. SHAYEN A. GEORGE, M.A., ASSOCIATES IN COUNSELING AND CHILD GUIDANCE, A PENNSYLVANIA DOMESTIC NONPROFIT CORPORATION v. ASSOCIATES IN CHILD GUIDANCE, INC., A CLOSE CORPORATION. APPEAL OF RICHARD SANDOW AND JONES, GREGG, CREEHAN GERACE, LLP. MARY L. WHITE, INDIVIDUALLY AND DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF ASSOCIATES IN CHILD GUIDANCE, INC., A CLOSE CORPORATION, v. SHAYEN A. GEORGE, M.A., ASSOCIATES IN COUNSELING AND CHILD GUIDANCE, A PENNSYLVANIA DOMESTIC NONPROFIT CORPORATION v. ASSOCIATES IN CHILD GUIDANCE, INC., A CLOSE CORPORATION. APPEAL OF SHAYEN A. GEORGE.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District.Argued September 9, 2002.
Decided October 1, 2002.

No. 22 WAP 2002, Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court.

Page 60

Stephen R. Poljak, Pittsburgh, for Appellant, Richard Sandow and Jones, Gregg, Creehan Gerace, LLP.

Stanley M. Stein, Pittsburgh, for Appellee, Mary L. White.

Richard Barry Sandow, John Paul Corcoran, Pittsburgh, for Appellee, Shayen A. George.

Brian Thornton Must, Pittsburgh, for Appellees, Shayen A. Gerorge and Assoc. in Counseling and Child Guidance.

Before ZAPPALA, C.J., and CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, and EAKIN, JJ.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.

Appeals dismissed as having been improvidently granted.